RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Bias in 5.5

> > R103-35:
> > Resolution: Accepted
> > 
> > - You asked clarification on Section 5.5.
> > - We suggested that issue R103-36 will significantly change Section 
> > 5.5.
> >   We will propose new wording (now in [3])and we will welcome your 
> > review.
> > - You answered to be happy to review.
> > 
> > + E-mail Trail
> > - Original Comment Richard Ishida (2006-03-21)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/0094.html
> > - VBWG official response to last call issue VBWG (2006-05-26)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0080.html
> > - Comments to VBWG official response Richard Ishida (2006-06-14)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0127.html


The new edits clarify this a lot.  The i18n WG is now satisfied. Thank you.

RI 
 


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/


 


________________________________

	From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] 
	Sent: 26 May 2006 15:27
	To: www-voice@w3.org
	Cc: Baggia Paolo; Richard Ishida
	Subject: Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Bias in 5.5
	
	
	 
	Issue R103-35
	
	Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 
	
	Resolution: Under discussion 
	
	The resolution of issue #36 will significantly change Section 5.5
[1].
	We will propose new wording and we will welcome your review. 
	
	
	[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/#S5.5
	
	Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.
	
	
------------------------------------------------------------------------
	---
	From: 
	Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:52:46 +0000
	To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
	Message-Id: <20060321175246.2EA484EFDE@homer.w3.org> 
	
	
	Comment from the i18n review of:
	http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/
	
	Comment 35
	At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
	Editorial/substantive: E
	Owner: RI
	
	Location in reviewed document:
	5.5
	
	Comment: 
	This whole section seems strangely biased.
	
	
	"In both cases the processor will not be able to distinguish when to
	apply the first or the second transcription."
	
	
	The above statement only applies for the text-to-speech author. For
ASR,
	this is a perfectly valid approach, and there solution will cause no
	problems.
	
	
	"the current version of specification is not able to instruct the
PLS
	processor how to distinguish the two pronunciations "should read
"the
	current version of specification is not able to instruct the PLS
	processor *performing text-to-speech* how to distinguish the two
	pronunciations".
	
	
	Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia
S.p.A.
	
	================================================
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
	This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
	above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
	the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
	is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
	the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to
	<mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank
you
	<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
	================================================

Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 13:40:04 UTC