- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:07:53 +0100
- To: "'Baggia Paolo'" <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
I think you should state this clearly in the specification, or remove the dc:lang example. The relative merits of the lang attribute vs the Content-Type meta element expressing language in HTML have caused a good deal of confusion. I wouldn't like to see this repeated in PLS. On the other hand, there is a larger discussion relating to use of xml:lang for which I am unable to find a comment, but which may be relevant here. Some of this relates to discussions we had at the SSML workshop in Crete. The basic question is: Is xml:lang appropriate to indicate the language for which the pronunciation lexicon is relevant (as stated in section 4.1). I think not, and that you need a different attribute - especially if lexicons are to become multilingual in the future, since xml:lang can only support a single value at a time. I have just sent an email on this topic to w3c-voice-wg with the subject '[ssml] Content marking using xml:lang'. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ ________________________________ From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] Sent: 26 May 2006 15:12 To: www-voice@w3.org Cc: Baggia Paolo; Richard Ishida Subject: Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language Issue R103-21 Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial Resolution: Reject We do not see any relationship between the two declarations. The attribute xml:lang is mandatory in PLS and dc:language will be ignored. Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection. Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- From: Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:44:02 +0000 To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org Message-Id: <20060321174402.29B634F400@homer.w3.org> Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/ Comment 21 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/ Editorial/substantive: S Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 4.3, 1st example Comment: How is dc:language="en-US" meant to be interpreted if it appears in a metadata element? How does it affect the xml:lang declaration on PLS elements? Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A. ================================================ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you <http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com ================================================
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 13:08:03 UTC