- From: Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:11:21 -0400
- To: "Nestor Urquiza" <nestoru@yahoo.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
Nestor, After a little discussion in the group, it turns out that we weren't very clear on this either. However, we have provisionally decided to allow them since VoiceXML does. We will clarify the issue in the next public draft. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Nestor Urquiza Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:09 AM To: www-voice@w3.org Subject: [scxml] nested conditions Hello all, After reading http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#N109D0 it is not clear to me if nested "<if>" are allowed. With an example is the code below supposed to be scxml valid? ... <n:if cond="status1 eq 'false'"> <!-- a first nested condition --> <n:if cond="status2 eq 'true' "> <n:assign name="result" expr="'status1 false'"/> <n:else> <n:assign name="result" expr="'statuses false'"/> </n:else> <n:else> <!-- another nested condition --> <n:if cond="status2 eq 'true' "> <n:assign name="result" expr="'statuses true'"/> <n:else> <n:assign name="result" expr="'status2 false'"/> </n:else> </n:else> </n:if> Thanks, Nestor __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:11:41 UTC