www-voice@w3.org from July to September 2006 by date

Friday, 29 September 2006

• How does VXML handle events sent by CCXML? Rajesh N
• How does VXML handle events sent by CCXML? Rajesh N

Friday, 22 September 2006

• RE: DOM bindings for read-only subset Matt Oshry
• RE: Timeout property or timeout attribute? Robert Keiller
• RE: Timeout property or timeout attribute? harbhanu
• DOM bindings for read-only subset Srinivas R Thota
• RE: Timeout property or timeout attribute? Robert Keiller
• RE: Timeout property or timeout attribute? harbhanu

Thursday, 21 September 2006

• Timeout property or timeout attribute? Dan Evans

Sunday, 17 September 2006

• Nuance SISR Implementation Report Carter, Jerry

Wednesday, 13 September 2006

• Re: Comments on LCWD, application.lastresult$ Shane Smith
• RE: Comments on LCWD, application.lastresult$ Tobias Göbel

Tuesday, 12 September 2006

• Comments on LCWD, application.lastresult$ Shane Smith
• last call working draft of VoiceXML 2.1 (modifications to section 6--<foreach>) James A. Larson
• Re: <foreach>: concern about executable content Carter, Jerry

Monday, 11 September 2006

• RE: Please redefine foreach element as it is in VoiceXML 2.1 CR Carter, Jerry

Friday, 8 September 2006

• [SCXML] Updated change proposal Torbjörn Lager

Monday, 4 September 2006

• <mark> and marktime Srinivas R Thota
• Re: FAQ Max Froumentin
• Sorry terben@gmail.com
• FAQ terben@gmail.com
• FAQ terben@gmail.com

Friday, 1 September 2006

• [SCXML] Change proposals Torbjörn Lager

Tuesday, 29 August 2006

• RE: tool for voice xml and ccxml interpeter Dirk Schnelle

Sunday, 27 August 2006

• tool for voice xml and ccxml interpeter Adi Even-Tzur

Monday, 21 August 2006

• Synergy SCXML Torbjörn Lager
• Re: <foreach>: concern about executable content Max Froumentin

Friday, 18 August 2006

• <foreach>: concern about executable content Andrew Hunt
• <foreach> clarifications requested Andrew Hunt

Tuesday, 8 August 2006

• RE: [v3] Some v3 functionality suggestions and scenarios McGlashan, Scott

Thursday, 3 August 2006

• RE: [v3] Some v3 functionality suggestions and scenarios Skip Cave
• Re: [v3] Some v3 functionality suggestions and scenarios Vibhu Garg

Wednesday, 2 August 2006

• Re: [v3] Some v3 functionality suggestions and scenarios Shane Smith
• RE: [v3] Some v3 functionality suggestions and scenarios Skip Cave
• [v3] Some v3 functionality suggestions and scenarios Skip Cave
• Re: VXML 2.1 and parsing of XML data Max Froumentin

Friday, 28 July 2006

• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language Richard Ishida

Thursday, 27 July 2006

• RE: Comments on Last Call Working Draft of Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS) - R100-1,R100-2,R100-3,R100-4 BAGSHAW Paul RD-TECH-REN

Friday, 28 July 2006

• Re: comment for PLS Last Call (R102) Baggia Paolo
• I: Comments on Last Call Working Draft of Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS) - R100-1,R100-2,R100-3,R100-4 Baggia Paolo
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor Richard Ishida
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why one lexicon per language? Richard Ishida
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Add lang="it" Richard Ishida
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Not easy in ASR Baggia Paolo
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Smyth Baggia Paolo
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Point to IPA picker Baggia Paolo
• RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Styling for MUST, SHOULD, etc Baggia Paolo
• R: PLS Last Call Comment From WAI/PF (R104) Baggia Paolo
• R: Comments on the Last Call Working Draft of the PLS specification (R105) Baggia Paolo

Thursday, 27 July 2006

• RE: Comments on the Last Call Working Draft of the PLS specification (R105) Deborah Dahl
• Re: PLS Last Call Comment From WAI/PF (R104) Dave Pawson
• Re: Comments on the Last Call Working Draft of the PLS specification (R105) Baggia Paolo
• Re: PLS Last Call Comment From WAI/PF (R104) Baggia Paolo
• Re: Comments on Last Call Working Draft of Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS) - R100-1,R100-2,R100-3,R100-4 Baggia Paolo
• Re: Meaning of the words "grapheme" and "orthography" (R101 of PLS Disp. of Comm.) Baggia Paolo

Monday, 24 July 2006

• Re: Expected output ... Dan Evans
• Expected output ... harbhanu

Thursday, 20 July 2006

• CCXML IR Tests Technologies @ Phonologies

Wednesday, 19 July 2006

• RE: [scxml] nested conditions Barnett, James

Saturday, 15 July 2006

• report of Chicago F2F meeting of the W3C Voice Browser Working Group James A. Larson

Friday, 14 July 2006

• [scxml] nested conditions Nestor Urquiza

Wednesday, 12 July 2006

• RE: [scxml] Flow Control Elements Barnett, James

Tuesday, 11 July 2006

• [scxml] Flow Control Elements Nestor Urquiza
• RE: [scxml] custom actions Barnett, James
• [scxml] custom actions Nestor Urquiza
• RE: some quick questions about scxml Barnett, James

Monday, 10 July 2006

• some quick questions about scxml Li Li

Friday, 7 July 2006

• Summary of the Second Workshop on Internationalizing SSML James A. Larson

Last message date: Friday, 29 September 2006 14:57:18 UTC