Wednesday, 28 June 2006
Tuesday, 27 June 2006
Friday, 23 June 2006
- clarification needed on VoiceXML 2.0
- Re: Enhanced Model for CCXML State Management
- Re: Enhanced Model for CCXML State Management
- Re: Enhanced Model for CCXML State Management
- RE: Enhanced Model for CCXML State Management
- Re: Enhanced Model for CCXML State Management
Thursday, 22 June 2006
Thursday, 15 June 2006
- RE: Issues with latest working draft (May 10, 2006) SCXML.xsd schema.
- Issues with latest working draft (May 10, 2006) SCXML.xsd schema.
Wednesday, 14 June 2006
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Bias in 5.5
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Variant id suggestion for TTS homograph disambiguation
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Problems with 4.5 japanese example
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Styling for MUST, SHOULD, etc
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Styling for MUST, SHOULD, etc
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Smyth
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Section 5.3
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Name of grapheme element
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: TTS vs. ASR in 4.5
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Not easy in ASR
Tuesday, 13 June 2006
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Alphabet on lexicon is default
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Definition of orthography
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: English in italian lexicon
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: it-IT
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Japanese mixtures
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Meta data container element
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Phonemic examples
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Point to IPA picker
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: s/then/than/
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Transformation ?
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why orthography attribute?
Monday, 12 June 2006
Wednesday, 7 June 2006
Tuesday, 30 May 2006
Wednesday, 31 May 2006
Tuesday, 30 May 2006
- Re: SCXML Extensions for graphical description
- RE: SCXML Extensions for graphical description
- SCXML Extensions for graphical description
Saturday, 27 May 2006
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: IPAHNDBK alternative ?
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Show simple PLS doc in intro
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Quotes missing
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Incorrect accent on italian text
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Alternate IPA characters ' and :
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Use characters rather than escapes in code
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Possible to choose language specific lexicon?
Friday, 26 May 2006
- Re: Comments on the Last Call Working Draft of the PLS specification
- Re: PLS Last Call Comment From WAI/PF
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Text out of synch with schema
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Embeddable in other formats?
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: English in italian lexicon
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: it-IT
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Name of grapheme element
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Japanese mixtures
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Variant id suggestion for TTS homograph disambiguation
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Phonemic examples
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Bias in 5.5
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why orthography attribute?
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Not easy in ASR
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Smyth
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Section 5.3
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Transformation ?
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Problems with 4.5 japanese example
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: TTS vs. ASR in 4.5
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: English in italian lexicon
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why one lexicon per language?
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Alphabet on lexicon is default
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Meta data container element
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Styling for MUST, SHOULD, etc
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Point to IPA picker
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: IPAHNDBK alternative ?
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Definition of orthography
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: s/then/than/
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Show simple PLS doc in intro
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Quotes missing
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Add lang="it"
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Incorrect accent on italian text
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: TTS or ASR?
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Alternate IPA characters ' and :
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: encoding=utf8
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Text out of synch with schema
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Embeddable in other formats?
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Use characters rather than escapes in code
- Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Possible to choose language specific lexicon?
- [pls] Final document on answers to I18N
Thursday, 18 May 2006
- Re: Learning VXML
- Re: Xerces can't parse Voice XML schema
- [www-voice] <none>
- Learning VXML
- Re: Xerces can't parse Voice XML schema
Wednesday, 17 May 2006
Monday, 15 May 2006
Friday, 12 May 2006
Thursday, 11 May 2006
Tuesday, 9 May 2006
Monday, 8 May 2006
Friday, 5 May 2006
Thursday, 4 May 2006
Friday, 5 May 2006
Thursday, 4 May 2006
Wednesday, 3 May 2006
Tuesday, 2 May 2006
Friday, 28 April 2006
Thursday, 27 April 2006
- RE: Suggested change to <audio/>
- RE: Suggested change to <audio/>
- Re: Suggested change to <audio/>
- Re: Suggested change to <audio/>
- Re: Suggested change to <audio/>
- Re: Suggested change to <audio/>
- Suggested change to <audio/>
- RE: [scxml] schema problem within <assign> node
- [scxml] schema problem within <assign> node
Wednesday, 26 April 2006
Tuesday, 25 April 2006
Tuesday, 18 April 2006
Thursday, 20 April 2006
- Re: Meaning of the words "grapheme" and "orthography"
- Re: Comments on Last Call Working Draft of Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS)
Tuesday, 18 April 2006
Monday, 17 April 2006
Thursday, 13 April 2006
- Re: SCXML : Event Generation and Dynamic Creation of Statechart
- RE: SCXML : Event Generation and Dynamic Creation of Statechart