RE: [pls] Invitation letter for WAI/I18N/MMI people interested on Pronunciation Lexicon spec


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Baggia Paolo 
    The "ipa" value is *should* so it is recognized by an 
    engine, but it is not required. The reason was to be close 
    to the wording of the SSML 1.0 Recommendation.

So an implementation can be compliant with a vendor specific
alphabet? That is not a standard Paulo ;-)

    I was going to invite some of you for a lunch to present 
    the PLS and to collect useful comment like the one you are 
    raising by this e-mail.
    Your confirmation will be appreciated. I was suggesting to 
    have it on Monday lunch time. Is it OK for you and other WAI people?

dp. Others from WAI may be there, but I will not be at the f2f.

Yes, I am unhappy. With that text there can be no standardisation.

I hope to finish my comments on the first draft tomorrow,
I will forward then.

regards DaveP.


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227


Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 16:02:50 UTC