- From: Douglas Currie <DugzDC@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:01:12 -0000
- To: <www-voice@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 21:05:59 UTC
Hi Teemu, Thanks very much for your reply - this is pretty much exactly what I wanted to hear. Thanks for your explanation - it was very clear. I agree that this sort of VXML is duff, but for slightly different reasons. I think that if someone defines a grammar '8', but there's an existing '88' inherited from an outer scope, there's a good chance the result won't be what the coder intended. Unless they are aware of that '88' grammar, interdigittimeout, rather than termtimeout, will be used. Normally the consequences will be irrelevant. It's nailed me once already, however. Especially important if you only have access to a 'slice' of the VXML (for example, not the root doc) and don't have access to the VXML browser diagnostics. Doug
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 21:05:59 UTC