- From: Dirk Schnelle <dirk@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:00:52 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Hi Bjoern, > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-voicexml21-20050613/ notes that > > [...] > Interpreters that support both VoiceXML 2.0 and VoiceXML 2.1 > must support the ability to transition from an application of > one version to an application of another version. > [...] > > This implies that VoiceXML 2.1 implementations are not required to > support VoiceXML 2.0 documents, it's however not clear why. Please > either change the document such that 2.1 implementations must also > support 2.0 documents or such that it is explained why VoiceXML > authors might find implementations that only support VoiceXML 2.1. I think that the reason is given in the paragraph above: [...] While the features of VoiceXML 2.1 are orthogonal additions to [VXML2], a VoiceXML application should not mix documents of both types. The handling of a single application that mixes VoiceXML 2.0 and VoiceXML 2.1 functionality is platform-specific. Reasonable behavior in this case ranges the gamut from successful execution to the throwing of an error. [...] IMHO the idea is that there should be a clear statement of the authors if they write for 2.1 or 2.0. /dirk
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 13:01:11 UTC