- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: 01 Jun 2005 14:43:52 -0600
- To: www-voice@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1117658630.3694.27.camel@localhost>
In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2005AprJun/0035.html, Dave Pawson wrote: 00-23 for hours. I'd rather stay with iso8601. Similarly, various other posters to the thread have seemed to accept as a premise that ISO 8601 does not allow "24" in an hours element. In the interests of having a clear record, perhaps it should be pointed out that if one would rather "stay with" ISO 8601, then the value 24 really does need to be allowed to appear in the hours field of time expressions. The copies of ISO 8601 I have on my shelf (the IS of 1988 and a "final draft" from 2000) both specifically mention that midnight may be denoted either as "00:00:00" or as "24:00:00" (clause 5.3.2 in each case). I suspect Mr. Pawson was misled by the restriction to the range 00-23 in the profile at http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime -- this is a change vis-a-vis ISO 8601, not a reflection of a restriction made by ISO 8601. In the context of the SSML 1.0 say-as element, it seems clear to me that Eira Monstad is right to suggest that a restriction to the range 0-23 is unhelpful in the task of describing time expressions in unconstrained natural-language text, and that the range 0-24 would be more useful. -C. M. Sperberg-McQueen World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2005 20:44:51 UTC