- From: Eira Monstad <eiram@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:12:32 +0200
- To: "Pawson, David" <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>, www-voice@w3.org
On Tue, 31 May 2005 15:07:44 +0200, Pawson, David <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk> wrote: > > > Hours are restricted to 0-23. In Norwegian, and probably other > > languages as well, 24 is often used instead of 00. > I have been reminded off-list that 24 and 00 are not the > same. > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime > > YYYY = four-digit year > MM = two-digit month (01=January, etc.) > DD = two-digit day of month (01 through 31) > hh = two digits of hour (00 through 23) (am/pm NOT allowed) > mm = two digits of minute (00 through 59) > ss = two digits of second (00 through 59) > s = one or more digits representing a decimal fraction of a > second > TZD = time zone designator (Z or +hh:mm or -hh:mm) > > 00-23 for hours. > I'd rather stay with iso8601. I quote from the say-as note: "Note that the "time" formats specified here do not correspond to ISO 8601 [ISO 8601:2000] time types. This is because the purpose of the say-as time type is different; it is to allow a synthesis processor to be able to correctly interpret as times strings commonly written in human-readable documents." Since the intention is not to be iso-compliant in the first place, it would make sense to do something that works internationally. The datetime format works fine for times intended to be machine-readable, but is not sufficient for human-readable documents in an international perspective. -- Eira Monstad Core QA
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 13:16:29 UTC