- From: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:40:39 +0000
- To: "McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com>
- Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>, <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
"McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com> wrote: > This approach does have some issues which require further analysis > for VoiceXML 3.0, including whether there should be a separate > <video> element rather than re-using <audio>, and how controls for > video-specific operations can be added. If others on this list are > interested continuing this discussion offline, please let us know. renaming <audio> to <video> prompts the question of whether to rename VoiceXML too. DialogML? Probably not a great idea marketing-wise. Max.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 17:40:59 UTC