- From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:05:22 +0100
- To: www-voice@w3.org
SSML does not define pronunciations of individual words -- Noted, and not expected. that would be handled via an external lexicon. I take it that the processor you're using is not giving you the pronunciation you would like? My issue is the XML one. I guess basically is a word using ncr's from outside a-zA-Z expected to be pronounced when the word is in use, defined by being in current dictionaries? If the word was found in a piece of text in xml:lang='fr' then I'd be upset if it wasn't pronounced correctly. Where is the boundary please? Should I have any expectations, or is this 'implementation defined'. regards DaveP -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 03:06:18 UTC