VoiceXML 2.0: Official Response #8 to Candidate Recommendation Issues

The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) is now completing its resolution
of 
issues raised during the review of the Candidate Recommendation version
of
VoiceXML 2.0 [1]. Our apologies that it has taken so long to respond.

Following the process described in [2] for advancement to Proposed
Recommendation, this is the VBWG's formal response to the issues you
raised.

Please indicate before 26 November 2003 whether you are satisfied with
the
VBWG's resolutions, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding,
or
whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 26 November, please let me
know.
The Director will appreciate a response whether you agree with the
resolutions
or not. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 26 November 2003,
we
will assume that you accept our resolutions.

Below you will find a summary of the VBWG's responses to each of your
issues. Please use the issue identifiers when responding.

Thank you,

Scott McGlashan
Co-chair, Voice Browser Working Group

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-voicexml20-20030220/ 
[2] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/ 


-----------------------------------------------
Issues you raised and VBWG responses
-----------------------------------------------

Issues: CR13-1
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2003JanMar/0098.html

Issue CR13-1
4.1 Prompts  (from Version 2.0 - 20 February 2003)


does not mention the version attribute 

as described by the DTD and schema

<!ATTLIST prompt
	bargein %boolean; #IMPLIED
	bargeintype %bargeintype; #IMPLIED
	cond %expression; #IMPLIED
	count %integer; #IMPLIED
	xml:lang NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
	timeout %duration; #IMPLIED
	xml:base %uri; #IMPLIED
	version CDATA #FIXED "1.0"
>

CR13-1 Resolution: rejected 

Since the version is fixed, we see no reason to discuss it further in
the text.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 14:33:32 UTC