- From: Daniel Burnett <burnett@nuance.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:19:44 -0700
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>, <w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org>
Dear Dan, Thank you for your comments on the SSML specification last year. Our responses are below. If you believe we have not adequately addressed your issues with our responses, please let us know as soon as possible. If we do not hear from you within 14 days, we will take this as tacit acceptance. Again, thank you for your input. -- Dan Burnett Synthesis Team Leader, VBWG [VBWG responses are embedded, preceded by '>>>'] -----Original Message----- From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:06 PM To: www-voice@w3.org Cc: w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org Subject: error in Speech Synth doc re RDF acronym / referencing RDF specs http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis/#S3.4 ...has an error: "RDF" expands to "Resource Description Framework" not "...Format". >>> Proposed disposition: Accepted >>> >>> We will correct this. I have cc:'d the Semantic Web Coordination Group since there may be a more general issue here w.r.t. the way your spec references RDF. W3C has a new batch of clarified/bugfixed RDF specs approaching Last Call. We should take care to note that your spec references RDF, and try to offer suggestions for referencing this work rather than the older efforts currently cited. >>> Proposed disposition: Accepted >>> >>> We would appreciate any specific suggestions you have for >>> more appropriate referencing of the RDF specifications for >>> any of the Voice Browser Working Group's specifications (SSML, >>> VoiceXML, SRGS). I've not reviewed the rest of the doc yet, but wanted to jot down the acronym expansion error and flag up the cross-spec referencing issue while I have a minute. cheers, Dan
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 14:19:57 UTC