- From: Scott McGlashan <scott.mcglashan@pipebeach.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 00:01:53 +0200
- To: "Ian Sutherland" <Ian.Sutherland@oracle.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
Ian, thank you for the input. The comment period for the Last Call of VoiceXML 2.0 closed in May 2002. However, I will register your comment in our change request process and try to address it in a future version. thanks Scott Leader, W3C VBWG Dialog team -----Original Message----- From: Ian Sutherland [mailto:Ian.Sutherland@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 21:23 To: www-voice@w3.org Subject: VXML 2.0 "expr" attribute of <audio> The latest publically available version of the VXML 2.0 Working Draft describes the "expr" attribute of <audio> as Dynamically determine the URI to fetch by evaluating this ECMAScript expression. However, multiple examples in the text of the draft (including one right at the start of 4.1.3) seem to indicate that if "expr" is a variable containing recorded audio, the recorded audio is supposed to be played at the point where the <audio> tag is, rather than trying to treat the recorded audio as a (no doubt ill-formed) URL. What are the exact rules for when the value of an <audio>'s "expr" is treated as a dynamically determined URL, and when it's treated as recorded audio? What if, for example, "expr" has a value that's a function call output? Is it possible to "construct" recorded audio using ECMAScript functions, and if so, would this be played? What if you have some other form input variable as the value of "expr", but it wasn't filled in with recorded audio? Will <audio> try to play it or treat is as a URL? I hope the way a value is treated is not dependent on the syntactic form of the "expr" value. -- Ian Sutherland Voice Laboratory E-mail: ian.sutherland@oracle.com Oracle Corporation Work: 312-704-4723 45th Floor, Sears Tower 233 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 18:02:19 UTC