Further comment on VoiceXML 2.0 Working Draft 24 April 2002

I missed one in my earlier message...

9. Section 5.1.3 says, when referring to XML-escaping characters such as 
<, >, and & :

"For clarity, examples in this document do not use XML escapes."

I strongly disagree with this decision. I think that having examples in the 
spec which do not work is more likely to lead to confusion than anything 
else. If there is a lack of clarity in VoiceXML in places, then I believe 
the spec should not try to hide the fact.

Matthew Wilson

Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 14:05:53 UTC