- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:48:41 -0400
- To: www-voice@w3.org
- Cc: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
At 11:33 PM 2001-09-23 , Susan Lesch wrote: > >Globally, white-space and whitespace -> white space (if you want to >follow XML 1.0, see http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-white-space). > Good edit, bad reference. The section cited above deals only with 'white space' appearing outside the markup. For the definition of what is to be considered as white space it depends on the syntax presented earlier in Common Syntactic Constructs http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-common-syn which is a better location to point to for the definition as used in XML 1.0. BTW if it is to be spelled 'white space' I would prefer it be glossarized with a reference to the XML specification. If agglutenated as one word it is easy to recognize that the technical sense including carriage return and line feed is intended. If spelled with two words it is more possible that readers will miss this nicety. Al
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 20:44:32 UTC