- From: Pawson, David <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 07:40:16 +0100
- To: "'www-voice@w3.org'" <www-voice@w3.org>
I'd call that burying ones head in the sand, I'm rather curious why the group are so cautious? DaveP > > Microsoft has advocated strongly to include XSL technologies > into the spec > during the discussion. Unfortunately, the majority members in > the W3C voice > browser working group uncharacteristically express fear, > uncertainties and > doubts against W3C's own XSL standard, and have consistently voted out > anything related to XSL, first in synthesis and this week, > recognition! > > Microsoft also demonstrated a more powerful dialog paradigm > can be easily > implemented in XSL and presented it to the working group in > May. Despite the > supports from the dialog communities, this working group > refused to even > consider the idea. As a result, the use of XSL in spoken language > applications is likely to remain a Microsoft proprietary extension. We > regret this working group's decisions to defeat W3C's own standard. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pawson, David [mailto:DPawson@rnib.org.uk] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 12:34 AM > To: 'www-voice@w3.org' > Subject: RE: http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kynn Bartlett [mailto:kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com] > > Sent: 30 August 2000 17:25 > > To: Pawson, David; 'www-voice@w3.org' > > Subject: Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis > > > > > > At 10:02 AM +0100 8/30/00, Pawson, David wrote: > > >There would appear to be no mention of the similar functionality > > >available in XSL, particularly > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#common-aural-properties > > >I believe that this set of properties follow broadly the CSS-2 > > >property set, yet no mention is made of them. > > > > How stable is the XSL-FO specification at this stage? I haven't > > been following closely enough to know if it's reached Rec yet. > > No, hopefully within the year it should move to candidate, > but rumour has it that its pretty stable. > > DaveP >
Received on Friday, 1 September 2000 02:40:17 UTC