- From: EDRIDGE, Dean <dean@dean.kiwi>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 05:16:27 +0200 (CEST)
- To: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
- Cc: "Settu, Senthil Kumar" <senthilkumarsettu@toppanmerrill.com>, "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <NBjgfYI--B-2@dean.kiwi>
Sorry, my suggestion only works on the Nu/new validator. Did you want to use both validators, and have documents validate on both validators? Is there any reason why you wouldn't be interested in using the XHTML variant of HTML5, sometimes called XHTML5, sometimes just called the XHTML or XML variant of HTML5? That would give you more options going forward. -- Dean Edridge 12 Sept 2022, 15:08 by dean@dean.kiwi: > Hi, > > If you change line 11 to: > <meta charset="utf-8"/> > > It validates all good. Would that work for you? > > -- > Dean Edridge > > > > 9 Sept 2022, 22:51 by senthilkumarsettu@toppanmerrill.com: > >> >> Hi v.Nu Team, >> >> >> >> >> >> I would like to highlight an issue “Nu Html Checker” with one of our xhtml file, please refer attached file. When we validate the file via W3C Markup validation service (>> https://validator.w3.org>> ) it got passed without errors, whereas same file validated with errors in Nu Html Checker (>> https://validator.w3.org/nu>> ), refer following error screenshot. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Error : Bad value content-type for attribute http-equiv on XHTML element meta. >> >> >> >> >> >> We couldn’t observe any issue with <meta> tag in the attached xhtml file, please help us understanding, why “Nu Html Checker” giving above error. >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me know if you need any additional inputs. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards. >> >> >> Senthil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Senthil Kumar Settu >> >> >> Senior Manager – XBRL Product Support >> >> >> SenthilKumarSettu@toppanmerrillLLC.com >> >> >> BridgeSupport@ToppanMerrill.com >> >> >> toppanmerrill.com <https://www..toppanmerrill.com/> >> >> >> This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown above or by return email and delete this communication and any copy immediately. Thank you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 12 September 2022 03:16:40 UTC