- From: Ed Brandon <ebrandon@cpha.ca>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:40:16 +0000
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, Philip Taylor <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- CC: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <94EF59A79E223E419FE0D530EBFCCA8A8426@CPHASRV8.cpha.ca>
Thanks, both. I’m now more confused than ever. From what I can tell, the target="_blank" is always valid. It need not be specific to either HTML 4 or 5, nor to the variants strict, transitional or frameset. It’s been around a while, and never changed. I tend to test snippets – equivalent to the contents of a page – because I’m using the Drupal CMS that was set up by a third party. It generates lots of correctly-identified errors. I live with that simply because I know it won’t be fixed. But I like to ensure that my contributions are OK. So I add snippets directly. The default options show as: [cid:image001.png@01D3943E.EFC848C0] I leave this alone. I do believe it should not give me an error message. But thanks again. I appreciate your very fast responses. I can live with this problem too, but thought you folks would want everything to work as well as possible (recognizing that there are very few bug-free programs – including those I write). - Ed ED BRANDON Volunteer Volontaire CANADIAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE 404-1525 Carling Ave. Ottawa ON K1Z 8R9 <http://www.cpha.ca> T: 613-725-3769 x 165 F: 613-725-9826 From: David Dorward [mailto:david@dorward.me.uk] Sent: January-23-18 11:31 AM To: Philip Taylor Cc: Ed Brandon; www-validator@w3.org Subject: Re: target is invalid attribute for a On 23 Jan 2018, at 16:07, Philip Taylor (RHUoL) wrote: I would suspect an inappropriate DOCTYPE. The following is valid : <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN"> That causes the validator to chuck a massive warning because the Document Type (-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN) is not in the validator's catalog. If you use the real HTML 4.01 Strict DTD: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> … then the validator will report the document as being invalid with the error Ed mentioned. It would be valid if the Transitional DTD was used: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> … but 2017 is leaving it more than a little late to start transitioning to HTML 4. It is also valid with the HTML 5 Doctype: <!DOCTYPE html>
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 16:40:45 UTC