Jens Oliver Meiert wrote: >> It's a bit confusing to find some validator warnings for the validator >> itself. > I agree that it would be nice if the validator yielded not only no > errors, but also no warnings, but those @types aren’t anything severe. > Is this not because http://validator.w3.org is written to conform to XHTML 1.0 Strict but with a trivial change of DOCTYPE to "pretend" that it is written to conform to HTML 5 ? Philip TaylorReceived on Sunday, 25 February 2018 13:08:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:00:03 UTC