- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:36:38 +0000
- To: Russ Elliott <russelliott@ntlworld.com>
- Cc: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 11:37:42 UTC
> > absent td or p tags closing tags for these elements are option in some contexts for example <p> <http://w3c.github.io/html/grouping-content.html#the-p-element> Tag omission in text/html: > A p element’s end tag may be omitted if the p element is immediately > followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, details, div, dl, > fieldset, figcaption, figure, footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, > hr, main, nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is > no more content in the parent element and the parent element is an HTML > element that is not an a, audio, del, ins, map, noscript, or video element. > So suggest that it is not reporting errors as they are not errors. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 21 February 2018 at 21:55, Russ Elliott <russelliott@ntlworld.com> wrote: > The following page contains about a dozen errors, all incorrectly closed or > absent td or p tags, but the Nu Html Checker reported no errors or > warnings: > http://www.gwr.org.uk/nopanniers-test.html > > regards > Russ Elliott > > > >
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 11:37:42 UTC