Re: [www-validator] <none>

On 21/09/2017 09:44, David Dorward wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Sep 2017, at 1:16, Mark D. Hamill wrote:
>
>> Not sure why this validated. It's quite a mess of missing tags.
>
> What tags are missing? Glancing over it, I couldn’t see any problems. 
> Did you miss the parts of the HTML specification that state some tags 
> may be omitted?
Can one legitimately have both

    <meta charset="utf-8">

and

    <link href="ct_base.css" rel="stylesheet" />

in the same document, one with an inferred </meta> and the other with an 
explicit " />" ?

Philip Taylor