- From: Eric Richards <2eric.richards@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:15:45 +1300
- To: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+Dr9Ba1xbv--vqqSA3sufST_-hvS5d8aiD4GRcwXcmcy5jbtQ@mail.gmail.com>
The subject should of been "*something to consider when are bored & want a hobby*" OK so here is something to go by by making a HTML file just using the contents in the yellow highlight This is a validation test and saving as filename.html Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 and Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 it passed both HTML 4.0 transitional & the CSS *(a very good effort that surprised me, someone must of listened to me when I made a complaint some time ago to one of their forums and someone else replied something like "the software is 2nd class web page making software what do you expect? " but then the page had much bigger content) * on the https://validator.w3.org/ and http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ websites LibreOffice 4.4.1.2. did not do so well it passed on CSS but failed the HTML test 6 errors and 1 warning Microsoft software was not so good MS Word 2010 XHTML transitional 21 Errors and 1 Warning CSS test 114 Errors MS Word 2016 XHTML transitional 21 Errors and 1 Warning CSS test 38 Errors None of this content is copyright just do not blame me if you think there is a error. I hope this gives someone some inspiration to give more solid test on a bigger variety of web page software out there. to make a magazine article or whatever to more public, so better webpages can be made >From Eric On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Eric Richards <2eric.richards@gmail.com> wrote: > try all the web page making software you can find including word > processors, write "this is validation test" without comas and > highlight if like to give CSS validate test, save most basic HTML > format with name-version.html then validate and let us know how many > errors & warnings, I keen to see table >
Received on Monday, 2 October 2017 22:16:09 UTC