- From: Eric Richards <2eric.richards@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:03:04 +1300
- To: "O'Guin, Phaewryn D." <JDO09280@ccv.vsc.edu>
- Cc: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
oh silly me, it looks like one fails to find a comment with in a comment. sorry my mistake. Even so it means the other one does not do its work so well. On 3/21/17, O'Guin, Phaewryn D. <JDO09280@ccv.vsc.edu> wrote: > I suspect the problem is elsewhere because I can go to > https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_input and put in exactly /* > and the */ and it comes back as perfectly valid. That is a correct CSS > comment format. Attach the entire file and I'll try to find your problem if > you'd like. > > > Regards, > > Phaewryn (J.D.) O’Guin > -----Original Message----- > From: David Dorward [mailto:david@dorward.me.uk] > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 3:06 AM - 3:06 AM > To: Eric Richards <2eric.richards@gmail.com> > Cc: www-validator@w3.org > Subject: Re: so who is right > > On 17 Mar 2017, at 1:03, Eric Richards wrote: >> we have >> https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator >> which does not like comments in between the /* and the */ >> >> but then thank goodness >> https://validator.w3.org >> finds everything OK > > One of those tools validates markup and one validates CSS … so they are > probably both right as far as their areas of interest are concerned. > It is difficult to tell what you mean though, and you didn’t provide a test > case to demonstrate the issue you are having. > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2017 08:03:47 UTC