- From: Eric Richards <dubdubdub.net.nz@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:31:43 +1200
- To: www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAB3-b-Hx=mXZ5rEVo+Bpz3bib3u8e32aYYz8XxJvszzZL8BOZA@mail.gmail.com>
I was trying to move from Transitional to strict (or the next improved version, if there is one) but now it does not like the attribute "ALIGN" as in align="right" example <img src="red-footpath-cancer.jpg" height="320" width="240" align="right"> I wonder how I can get around it, without say changing the table from 2 column to 3 column table >From Eric On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Eric Richards <dubdubdub.net.nz@gmail.com> wrote: > I was trying to move from Transitional to strict (or the next improved > version, if there is one) > > but now it does not like the attribute "ALIGN" as in align="right" > example > <img src="red-footpath-cancer.jpg" height="320" width="240" align="right"> > > I wonder how I can get around it, without say changing the table from 2 > column to 3 column table > > From Eric > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:08 AM, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> > wrote: > >> On 13 Sep 2015, at 18:33, Eric Richards wrote: >> >> I am thinking if (-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict //EN is not in their >> catalog >> then why are they suggestion it could be used ? >> >> "They", whoever they are, made a mistake. >> >> The Doctype declaration for HTML 4.01 strict is: >> >> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" >> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> >> >> …without the word Strict in the public identifier. >> >> -- >> David Dorward >> http://dorward.co.uk/ >> > >
Received on Sunday, 13 September 2015 18:32:11 UTC