- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:55:44 +0100
- To: John Bilicki III <jabcreations@hotmail.com>
- Cc: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vn_6AyQPj4hWhfTF4=Q7jLf0RkOaWOFsRdmT1-L_AD_cA@mail.gmail.com>
> > Validating the following generates the error 'Section lacks heading'... it is a 'warning' not an error, it is not a MUST requirement its a SHOULD It seems more logical to accept the generic 'header' element as a valid > header for sidebar section elements. > header [1] is not a generic heading [2], it has a different meaning , for example header does not contribute to the document outline, and different accessibility layer semantics <hx> = heading <header> = banner when scoped to <body>. [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-header-element [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-h1,-h2,-h3,-h4,-h5,-and-h6-elements -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 20 September 2014 22:40, John Bilicki III <jabcreations@hotmail.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > Validating the following generates the error 'Section lacks heading'... > > ____________________________________________________________ > <!DOCTYPE html> > <html> > <head> > <title>XHTML5 Test</title> > </head> > > <body> > > <main><article><p>...</p></article></main> > > <aside> > <section> > <header><span>Search Website...</span></header> > <div><span>The sidebar, <em>not</em> to be inside an article > element.</span></div> > </section> > > </body> > </html> > > ____________________________________________________________ > > It seems more logical to accept the generic 'header' element as a valid > header for sidebar section elements. > > John Bilicki >
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 09:56:51 UTC