- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 07:56:44 +0200
- To: Ciro Cefalo <cirocefalo@hotmail.com>, "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>, cirocefalo@gmail.com
2014-03-16 19:48, Ciro Cefalo wrote: > i’ve validated the homepage of my website and i’ve adjusted all the > errors. The only one that i can’t adjust is <link rel=”publisher” . > This is a new rel attribute to connect my page to my Google+ Local Business. > I won’t delete this link and I hope that you can do something about this. > Thank you very much for reading this message. > Ciro > > To contact me back you can send me an email to the following address: > cirocefalo@gmail.com <mailto:cirocefalo@gmail.com> The value “publisher” is explicitly listed as disallowed at http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#dropped It’s in a document that is normatively cited in W3C HTML5 CR as well as WHATWG Living HTML, so there’s little a validator could validly do but report the value as an error. The logic of the rel attribute has always been a mess, and HTML5 isn’t making it any better. The practical advice I would give is this: use rel attribute values that you know to be useful, in the sense that some software is known to use them in a manner that suits your needs. Ignore the rest. (Most rel attributes are write-only markup: people spend time and effort in getting them “right”, but programs just ignore them.) In this case, you seem to have a good reason, judging from the Google page “Link to your website”, https://support.google.com/plus/answer/1713826 Regarding the validator message, just ignore it. If you would like to have rel="publisher" registered as allowed (which would really be a job for Google to do if they wish to publicly promote such a value), then you need to take it to discussions about HTML development at W3C and/or WHATWG. Yucca
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 05:57:13 UTC