2014-04-18 16:15, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 04/18/2014 09:06 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: >> To answer the basic question, it is conforming. HTML+RDFa is an >> approved extension to HTML5. > > To clear up future confusion, consider filing a new bug and pointing to > the following comment: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21341#c8 If I read the comments right, the policy is that as soon as something has been defined as an extension to HTML(5) at a First Public Working Draft level or higher, the validator will start regarding it as valid, without even issuing a warning. I would say that this very much causes confusion. This sounds very messy, and it means that there is no tool for checking whether a document conforms to the HTML5 CR or, in the future, the HTML5 specification. YuccaReceived on Friday, 18 April 2014 13:41:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:41 UTC