- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:06:30 -0500
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: Mark Rogers <mark.rogers@powermapper.com>, "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reGPesfgkYBhKJwAA2o3Eu_xS3EEZq7EJ7oG2jCkPq_8PQ@mail.gmail.com>
To answer the basic question, it is conforming. HTML+RDFa is an approved extension to HTML5. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > The validator now accepts full RDFa 1.1 markup in HTML documents. > > Mark Rogers <mark.rogers@powermapper.com>, 2014-04-17 08:29 -0500: > > > I believe the validator used to flag using the REV attribute on A and > > LINK elements as obsolete, but no longer does this. The REV attribute is > > still marked as non-conforming in the HTML5 CR and nightly specs. The > > language looks the same in all the versions: > > > > "11.2 Non-conforming features" > > "The following attributes are obsolete (though the elements are still > part of the language), and must not be used by authors: > > "rev on a elements" > > "rev on link elements" > > > > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/CR/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-html5-20140204/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features > > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features > > > > Looking into this a bit deeper, I think there might be a mismatch > between the HTML5 CR and the RFDa recommendation (which says "RDFa supports > the use of @rel and @rev on any element.") > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdfa-core-20130822/#examples > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdfa-core-20130822/#A-rev > > > > There are also 4 tests in the conformance checker test suite that use > the REV attribute, with the naming indicating validators should not flag a > conformance error: > > html-rdfa/0006-isvalid.html > > html-rdfa/0007-isvalid.html > > html-rdfa/0009-isvalid.html > > html-rdfa/0010-isvalid.html > > > > So, what's the correct behaviour - is this conforming or non-conforming? > > > > Best Regards > > Mark > > > > Mark Rogers - mark.rogers@powermapper.com<mailto: > mark.rogers@powermapper.com> > > PowerMapper Software Ltd - www.powermapper.com< > http://www.powermapper.com> > > Registered in Scotland No 362274 Quartermile 2 Edinburgh EH3 9GL > > > > -- > Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTURb/AAoJEIfRdHe8OkuVDCUP/3gCdjPUYVh4gyVLO6wkbo7K > kh0Gp80YKaHKhBCmLUAk0RFe8zy2XopTHMNSmIbT7HcFOL+s/UxtTN3hFtzsge03 > zlIvuHHLJhwH8fBxqKYhZwgFFk7FpPk6A9EDnFNXZ+VcI7L51x9xOFrlXRmgLwZD > RT9AD+ehKz+zI3rDVwayjSbNEISpUCShG9EYSNtlKdhbkCvSFVBYFTdgi65lrT3j > yXvhIP7xhtuS449yr4xw0fu70qSEqGp6D5Qb8ud+wgaehxklCmddoeX0E+eIrZOS > 8PBmBo8nNpzyAWeDPpTrKDZS42eozh66ILPMtrACwglJ2VBc9eXi1uU8xcHPEo94 > IHRqlmR1bSiMcGPxVH4ys/2hADqik8Bp4b8HnMxX4bi1kuE28Xda0bLJaBm/iaun > XqWTBu/foWpxVsCQsI7nwrMgwX2exyx3cpDWLW8DNZm3isMYCIie9L2znbfhdK5L > uauVqbD5V2zGXAN7AQZEw11mFNhfl4+pYAX5Fl4Riufs3vz/01t8E/uQjzLjbQYH > atrakFJQyWm+NEmw+EVOHI19Kcv6mrMsKx74SY6fRZrgOZd6v92F18Yany5ro2ey > tQGR43ByIVUAy3FmwihlLLlB+UVvwYytHNEYmvdBc3pOnyacKIuUzVUvf1HtTjKC > XS5qIzOhDVyNyxUSDMdU > =psAn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 13:07:01 UTC