- From: Jan P. <proedie@arcor.de>
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:21:57 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Hello, Phillip! Am 03.09.2013 11:31, schrieb Philip Taylor: > I am confused; if you are able to get at the internals of the generator > so as to force it to omit the (completely ridiculous and non-conforming) > "generator-unable-to-provide-required-alt" attribute, why can you not > instead force it to omit a (normal and completely conforming "alt" > attribute with either a semantically useful value (e.g., "Picture of > a Royal Albatross") and if that is not possible (because the generator > is entirely automated and has no knowledge of the subject matter of > the image) a semantically valid but less useful value such as "Image > contents unknown to generator" ? I am writing the generator. It parses text from a source that gives me no information about the image but the file name. Of course I could write something like 'Image contents unknown'. That's what I would have done if there weren't a generator-unable-to-provide-required-alt attribute. But since it's there I would like to use it. The validator, as it is now, is confusing. Best wishes Jan PS I accidentally sent this message from the wrong account yesterday. Sorry for the delay.
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 13:22:26 UTC