- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:53:17 +0300
- To: "Felix E. Klee" <felix.klee@inka.de>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
2013-10-01 11:07, Felix E. Klee wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> > wrote: >> The construct >> >> >> <label> >> <input type="radio" /> >> <input type="text" /> >> </label> >> >> would be rather odd, in addition to being invalid; the error >> processing rule means that the radio button is the labeled control and >> the text input control is its label! > > I don't want to argue, but: Lists or collections of radio buttons > sometimes have a free-form option, in addition to predefined options. You can have such an option, though it will be parallel to a group of radio buttons rather than part of it. The point is, anyway, that the free text input field is not a label for a radio button. Rather, you would have (after normal radio buttons) something like <input id="other" type="radio" ...> <label for="other">Other</label>, <label for="custom">please specify:</label> <input id="custom" type="text" ...> Yucca
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 09:53:46 UTC