- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:52:06 -0400
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnHmEht95tykKqu08DrwUX-h6SZdbmL8uPZvnUbFEcqZMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, 2013-07-05 12:23 -0400: > > > Looks like http://validator.w3.org/nu/ does allow meta elements with the > > RDFa Lite property attribute. The rules are defined in HTML+RDFa 1.1 [1]. > ... > > In other words, this markup should validate when placed inside the body > of > > an HTML5 document. > > <meta property="dc:creator" content="Fyodor Dostoevsky" /> > > <link property="dc:creator" href="http://example.org/" /> > > > > I've placed a document with this markup at [2]. > > I made some changes to the validator sources and pushed them to the W3C > validator. The document at [2] should validate as expected now. > Thanks Mike. Are there tests for the validator to avoid regressions? I would be happy to provide HTML documents featuring different kinds of markup which are supposed to validate (and others which are not supposed to validate). Steph. > > > http://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.openspring.net%2F2013%2Frdfa%2Fmeta-link.html > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html-rdfa/#extensions-to-the-html5-syntax > > [2] http://files.openspring.net/2013/rdfa/meta-link.html > > -- > Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike > -- Steph.
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 13:52:34 UTC