- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:40:54 +0900
- To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, 2013-07-05 12:23 -0400: > Looks like http://validator.w3.org/nu/ does allow meta elements with the > RDFa Lite property attribute. The rules are defined in HTML+RDFa 1.1 [1]. > Here are the relevant excerpts: > > - If the @property RDFa attribute is present on the link or meta elements, > they MUST be viewed as conforming if used in the body of the document. > - If the RDFa @property attribute is present on the link element, the @rel > attribute is not required. > - If the RDFa @resource attribute is present on the link element, the @href > attribute is not required. > - If the RDFa @property attribute is present on the meta element, neither > the @name, @http-equiv, nor @charset attributes are required and the > @content attribute MUST be specified. > > In other words, this markup should validate when placed inside the body of > an HTML5 document. > <meta property="dc:creator" content="Fyodor Dostoevsky" /> > <link property="dc:creator" href="http://example.org/" /> There's currently a bug in HTML+RDFa checking in the validator that I accidentally introduced as a regression when I was trying to allow the case of a meta element with both a "name" attribute and a "property" attribute to be valid. I'll fix is some time this week. --Mike > I've placed a document with this markup at [2]. > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html-rdfa/#extensions-to-the-html5-syntax > [2] http://files.openspring.net/2013/rdfa/meta-link.html -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Monday, 8 July 2013 03:41:09 UTC