Re: Ooops

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:23:10 +0200, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

> ... For more info see ...

Thanks: I spent a jolly hour or so reading through that long page :-) .

But having at one point in my life wasted more time than proper on learning 
-- well, trying to learn -- wml, I must say I was rather sorry to meet 

> Sorry, we cannot find the page

For I had really hoped to see more of what triggered the remark, "It's like 
2003 never happened, let alone 2007. Also probably the last remaining 
references to WMLScript on the entire interweb."

But far fewer cell phones these days than in 2001 use browsers grasping 
only WML, so it's rather much less important to know the ins and outs of 
basic wml syntax, structure, or morphology than it once was.

Cheers, -- tlvp
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.

Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 14:51:46 UTC