- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:24:50 +0300
- To: jesse greer <jjesterj@msn.com>
- CC: "www-validator@w3.org" <www-validator@w3.org>
2013-08-20 19:06, jesse greer wrote: > Error message: Bad value up tag for attribute rel on element a: The > string up is not a registered keyword or absolute URL. That's correct. As per current HTML5 drafts, "up" is not an allowed value, but it is listed in the "dropped without prejudice" section of in the excuse for a wannabe fake "standard", the "existing rel values" "wiki": http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#dropped_without_prejudice > See: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/links.html#link-type-up You're referring to a page that is over 2½ years old and itself declares (albeit not in these terms) its status as work-in-progress only. Note that it contains links under "Latest Published Version" and "Latest Editor's Draft". What the validator is really doing (though this has never been officially stated, as far as I know) is to try to check against the Latest Editor's Draft, now called "HTML 5.1 Nightly", except when the authors of the validator disagree with it. Yucca
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 16:25:19 UTC