- From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:12:48 +0900
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Hello Mike, thank you for quick update. 2012/10/27 Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>: > About the second case, that's not a bug, because the spec does actually > require the fractional parts of seconds to be one, two, or three digits: > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html#valid-time-string > > So the examples in that spec such as "14:54:39.92922" are actually not > valid datetime values, and so for that I've filed a spec bug: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19732 Ah, I didn't notice the "up to three digits" definition of fractional part. I prepared 'fraction safe' test file, and the validator successfully answered it was valid. http://www.kanzaki.com/works/2012/test/1027-time.html Thank you for maintaining useful tools. -- @prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name "KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 06:13:15 UTC