- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 07:36:20 +0100
- To: "www-validator@w3.org Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
On 3 Sep 2011, at 05:45, Antonio Zamora wrote: > Based on the description that you have quoted, the validator is right. > However, the lack of a percentage specification would be a great > handicap for authors. Not really. We do have CSS. You could try taking it up with the HTML working group though, they are responsible for the contents of the specification. > By the way, the w3schools.com site lists percentage values under size > and width for iframes, and I am glad that the major browsers support > them. > http://www.w3schools.com/html5/tag_iframe.asp I'll add it to my list of reasons why W3Schools is dreadful. > As a side note, I would like to note that I have been forced to code > frameborder="0" on iframes even though frameborder is obsolete > because IE does not recognize style="border:0;" in the iframe and the > "seamless" attribute is not implemented in any browser yet. Umm, so lobby the browser vendors to implement it? -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 06:36:55 UTC