On 19 May 2011, at 15:45, Manuel Calvo wrote: > As you can see, the first example doesn't have the <html> opening tag (which should be required) and still pass the code as valid. It is valid. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#optional-tags If you think that part of HTML 5 shouldn't be backwards compatible with HTML 4 then you should raise that with the working group. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukReceived on Friday, 20 May 2011 09:05:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:21 UTC