- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:04:42 +0100
- To: Manuel Calvo <ak.abaddon@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-validator@w3.org Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 09:05:15 UTC
On 19 May 2011, at 15:45, Manuel Calvo wrote: > As you can see, the first example doesn't have the <html> opening tag (which should be required) and still pass the code as valid. It is valid. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#optional-tags If you think that part of HTML 5 shouldn't be backwards compatible with HTML 4 then you should raise that with the working group. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 09:05:15 UTC