Re: w3c validator - possible error

On 19 May 2011, at 15:45, Manuel Calvo wrote:
> As you can see, the first example doesn't have the <html> opening tag (which should be required) and still pass the code as valid.

It is valid. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#optional-tags

If you think that part of HTML 5 shouldn't be backwards compatible with HTML 4 then you should raise that with the working group.

-- 
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk

Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 09:05:15 UTC