W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > May 2011

Fwd: Call for Review: EARL 1.0 Last Call Working Draft

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4DCA8A22.9000702@w3.org>
To: public-unicorn@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org, www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Apologies for cross posting, I believe this may be interesting for work 
related to markup validation and quality assurance.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Call for Review: EARL 1.0 Last Call Working Draft
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:15:59 +0000
Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:12:54 -0500
From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Dear WAI Interest Group (IG) Participants,

WAI invites you to comment on the Last Call Working Draft of EARL and 
related documents published 10 May 2011:
      * Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema - Last Call 
Working Draft
      * Developer Guide for Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 - 
updated Working Draft
      * HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 - updated Working Draft
      * Representing Content in RDF 1.0 - updated Working Draft
      * Pointer Methods in RDF 1.0 - updated Working Draft

EARL provides a way to combine results from different web accessibility 
evaluation tools, and to share results between tools. For example, with 
EARL an authoring tool can get accessibility information from an 
evaluation tool. EARL is a machine-readable format for expressing test 
results in a vendor-neutral and platform-independent format. It is 
introduced in:
      EARL Overview

WAI encourages feedback from developers and researchers who are 
interested in software-supported evaluation and validation of websites, 
and by those who are interested in Semantic Web technologies for content 
description, annotation, and adaptation. Please send comments to the 
publicly-archived list:
      by *10 June 2011*

Status of documents:

EARL 1.0 Schema is intended to become a W3C Recommendation. The other 
four documents are currently planned to become W3C Notes. The difference 
between W3C Recommendations and W3C Notes -- and Last Call, Candidate 
Recommendation, and other development stages -- is described in:
       How WAI Develops Accessibility Guidelines through the W3C Process

The Working Group believes is has addressed all comments received so far 
and is looking for feedback, especially on EARL 1.0 Schema before it 
progresses to Candidate Recommendation Working Draft. The "Status of 
this Document" sections of the publications include specific questions 
and guidance for providing comments.

Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you in advance for 
your comments.

Feel free to circulate this message to other lists; please avoid 
cross-postings where possible.
Short URI to this archived e-mail: http://bit.ly/earl20115

~Shawn Henry, WAI Outreach
   Shadi Abou-Zahra, ERT Chair

Shawn Lawton Henry
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
e-mail: shawn@w3.org
phone: +1.617.395.7664
about: http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 13:08:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:21 UTC