Re: It isn't a standard if it has hidden rules for historical reasons.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:21 UTC

As Jukka kindly points out :

> You can't have a UL as a direct (or indirect) descendant
> of a P, simply because the HTML syntax says so. Block-level elements
> often nest; for example, DIV elements may be nested as much as you like.

and DIV elements can also directly contain ULs, so perhaps the more
natural expression for what you want to accomplish is :

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
	<TITLE>Hallo</TITLE>
	<STYLE TYPE="TEXT/CSS">
		UL {margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0; padding-top: 0; padding-bottom: 0}
	</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
	<DIV class="Paragraph">text text
		<UL>
			<LI>more text</LI>
		</UL>
	text text</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>

Philip Taylor