- From: Galesloot, Matthijs <matthijs.galesloot@atosorigin.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:29:35 +0200
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8610FC2B6B14974594B85B7EA14E30A2044FF5D3@aownlex010.europe.nl.intra>
Hi I am developing a tool for validating the quality of web files. This tool will be part of the sonar quality dashboard, a popular open source product used by developers in java, .NET and PHP. See [1] and [2]. The goal is to help developers aiming to deliver standards compliant web sites. We do that by inspecting and validating the HTML, as part of the continuous integration process. The sonar dashboard provides a convenient tool to inpects the errors, and browse to the HTML. On top of that, metrics are provided and can be followed over time. The W3C Markup validator is a powerful and important tool for validating HTML. Therefore I am planning to provide a batch interface to this service. I have already run some tests with the W3C Markup validator with success. I am aware that using the W3C Markup Validator in a batch process may degrade performance for other users. I have implemented a 1 second delay between the requests, as suggested on the W3C web site. But what if multiple users would start a batch validation? My tool will make this easy... I recommend users of my tool to install their own Markup Validation service, but I would not be able to stop them from using http://validator.w3.org/. What are your thoughts on this topic? Do you have other concerns and suggestions? Let me know if you need more information. Kind regards Matthijs Galesloot [1] http://www.sonarsource.org/ [2] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Web+Plugin
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: disclaimer.txt
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 19:36:40 UTC