As an example of the subject line, a page I sought to validate returned a report of 20 errors however, after sorting through all the extraneous data, I discovered there were only two. Just out of curiosity, I re-entered the two errors and ran the page through WDG's validator and received a report listing only the actual errors which greatly simplified a fix. Next, one error was purposely inserted and the page run through W3C resulting in a report stating there were nine errors. Apparently, you're following Microsoft's lead in making simple things complicated by listing several subsequent errors created as a result of one primary error which makes the actual problem more difficult to discern. Why not keep it simple? FredReceived on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 04:42:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:17 UTC