- From: Joe Java <cop3252@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Michael\(tm\) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Hello Mike
> I will take a look at all of them and see where the
> problems are.
> Off the top of my head, I'd say that one reason for the
> difference
> might be that when you check the corresponding content as
> XHTML
> 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 with the W3C Markup Validator, there
> are some
> things that's not checking but that the validator.nu
> backend at
> http://qa-dev.w3.org:8888/ is checking. In particular,
> the
> validator.nu backend is doing some datatype checking on
> attribute
> values which I suspect the (DTD-based)
> XHTML-1.1-plus-MathML-2.0
> is not doing.
>
> Anyway, I will take a look at all the errors today and see
> what I find.
>
Thank you for the changes you made to the validator.nu backend at
http://qa-dev.w3.org:8888/
I think everything is working correctly with the validator now.
I got all the pages to compile OK except for
https://eyeasme.com/Joe/MathML/HTML5/basics.html
and
https://eyeasme.com/Joe/MathML/HTML5/extras.html
All the other pages required changes in them to compile cleanly.
The two pages that do not validate use the "semanatic" tag in a
non-validating manner. The validator correctly points out the
incorrect use of the tag and a careful reading of the MathML specs
confirms the validators results.
I know of no errors in the validator at http://qa-dev.w3.org:8888/
with regard to HTML5 and MathML.
The production W3C validator should be updated with these changes.
Joe
Received on Saturday, 12 June 2010 06:03:11 UTC