Re: inconsistency: validating an XHTML 1.1 + SVG document with a W3C-provided DOCTYPE throws a warning

On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Mitch wrote:

> It seems the provided DOCTYPE examples on
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html need updating to:
> 
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC
> 
>      "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 plus SVG 1.1//EN"
>      "http://www.w3.org/2002/04/xhtml-math-svg/xhtml-math-svg-flat.dtd">
> 
> or that the validator's warning link needs updating to point to a more
>  recent sample DOCTYPEs page.

It's the latter.  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8270

Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 17:21:05 UTC