W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Fwd: Re: Check existence of class names

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:22:07 +0100
Message-ID: <4C6C24CF.5000102@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Siegfried Gipp <siegfried@rorkvell.de>
CC: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>, www-validator@w3.org
But do you not see the difference in the two syntaces,
Siegfried ?  You have


I have


Does the former not look odd to you ?

Philip Taylor

Siegfried Gipp wrote:

 >>> what is strange about that?
 >> The syntax.  Maybe :
 >>       <span class="dc:subject">Discussion about non-existent classes</span>
 >> Philip Taylor
 > Well, the only "strange" part of the syntax here is the usage of a
 > namespace in a class name. But that's not that strange. Just have a look
 > at the w3c ARIA docs and f.ex. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role/ (the
 > role attribute module). So using a namespace prefix in a class name is
 > possible. But it is only useful in xml (xhtml) documents, since
 > namespaces are not usable in html.
 > That's all.
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 18:22:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:18 UTC