- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:19:13 +0100
- To: W3C Validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
OK, I think if we agree that a web page is in fact the sum of its parts (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, <whatever>), then it is perfectly reasonable to hope for (or even write) a tool that checks the entire ensemble for consistency. That said, I don't know of any such tool as of now, nor would I have a great deal of hope that the developers of the HTML & CSS validators might merge their efforts in the near future. Even harder would to allow scripting into the equation, since if scripting were considered relevant one would not even have a set of static documents to compare (and therefore the results of the comparisons could vary with the phase of the moon, or with any other non-controllable variable). But at least we now both agree on what it is you are seeking : I am just (perhaps) less hopeful than you that such a tool will shortly be available. ** Phil. -------- chukharev@mail.ru wrote: > Philip Taylor wrote : >> But when you talk of a "definition", are you not leaving the >> world of HTML and entering the world of CSS ? > Yes, I am. That's the reason I was talking about the thing being > in between Markup and CSS Validators. Probably, something else > like MobileOK Checker is even better tool to include these new > features, I do not know. It was just a guess that Markup Validator > is the best candidate... > > I see an additional task (or few of them) for developers. > > A possible way is to extend CSS Validator so that it can show > all names defined for classes, pseudo-classes etc in case of > "Valid CSS" result, extend Markup Validator to show a list of > used names (classes, ids etc), and create a new service in Unicorn > which compares those lists and makes relevant conclusions. > > Regret I cannot volunteer for any of these tasks...
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 14:19:48 UTC