- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:44:51 +0000
- To: kb8qeu <kb8qeu@suddenlink.net>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
kb8qeu wrote: > It is aparent that W3C does not know HTM 4.0 languahe. I tested a page > just now and is perfect. However, the "validator" says there were > warnings and errors in it. Kept sugesting CSS and Xhtml junk. More likely, you are confusing "HTML 4.0" with "What errors commonly used browsers tend to recover from". > Its the validator site which in in error using java and style sheets! > Which is not HTM protocols. JavaScript and CSS embedded in a webpage using script and style elements or intrinsic event and style attributes must follow the rules for those elements and attributes. > I looked at the valadating page andsaw many errors in it! If you think you have found errors with the client side code at http://validator.w3.org/ - then please file specific bug reports rather then simply claiming "many errors". I doesn't seem likely that they have a significant number of problems. > If you want to look at my page go to http://pages.suddenlink.net/kb8qeu/ > and see for yourself that it is perfect htm coding. No, I wouldn't describe that as perfect. > It is those pages that has Java, stylesheets, ablets, <span></span>, and > other non-htm coding, that prevents 70 to 75 precent internet users from > using the internet. No. It is perfectly possible to remain accessible while using modern technologies - they just have to be used correctly. (Please direct follow-ups to the www-validator mailing list, and not directly to me) -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 10:45:46 UTC