- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:38:57 +0300
- To: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@mac.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Michael A. Peters wrote: >> Despite what the validator says, the document is in fact not "valid >> XHTML 1.1", to the extent that such an expression makes sense. The >> document is valid (markup conforms to the DTD specified) but it does >> not use a DTD specified in XHTML 1.1 specifications. > > It does, just has some additions added to it - the X part of XHTML No, you either use the specific DTD or you don't. If you don't, you might still call your markup XHTML (or HTML or XML or whatever you like), but it isn't XHTML 1.1. The "X" in "XHTML" is just hype, though technically it means that the syntax is based on XML, the strongly simplified version of SGML. HTML is just as extensible as XHTML is. > I like pages with the icons on web pages because when there is a > problem rendering, it allows me to quickly and easily see if the > problem is a bug. How many of your _visitors_ are interested in debugging your pages? And do you mean that the icon that _claims_ the markup to be valid is useful for _checking_ whether it is? There's something odd in that idea, but the fact is that many of the "Valid HTML" icons make a false claim, often an intentionally false claim (that is, a lie). That's one of the reasons why they should be used: people have no grounds for trusting on them. > So displaying the badge serves a purpose there, I'm sure I'm not the > only one with that philosophy about reporting errors. What about the 99 % of surfers who have no intention of reporting markup errors? And I thought the idea was that an author who adds a "Valid HTML" icon has himself taken care of validation. If the icon is meant to say "I want to use valid markup, please help me with that!", then it should really say that and not something rather opposite. Maybe the change of a single character could do that. "Valid HTML?" might convey the message, but it would not make any sense to the majority of users. After all, people who use the Web should not need to know _anything_ about HTML, any more than a newspaper reader should need to know about the software and data formats used to produce the paper. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 16:41:27 UTC