- From: Ruud Steltenpool <svg@steltenpower.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:35:56 +0100
- To: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
> I usually visit W3C's validator when my browser crashes when visiting > a site. I run the offending page through the validator, screen capture > the results as a PNG, and send the PNG to the offending site's > webmaster. That sounds like a very useful thing to do. Thank you for the effort, please keep doing it. I hope you also send along a link to the validator so the webmaster can use it as a debug tool and maybe tell his/her colleagues about it. >>From the use above, it would be convenient to be able to select > 'Errors Only'. I find when working from a handheld, if a site is a > major offender (50-100 Errors and 700-1000 warnings), the handheld > drops to its knees when the warnings come over the air. As a temporary alternative you could use a different validator at http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ which has that option. I personally agree that indeed 'the' validator, from W3C, should have this option too. If you find out where/what the changes in the source code should be, that would speed up things significantly. Ruud
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 09:36:28 UTC